it takes two to Tarot ;)

Tarot – english

IT ONLY TAKES TWO TO TAROT/

A MIRROR OF THE SOUL Many things have been said about the Tarot, lots of which are pure invention and fantasy. There is no conclusive research to this day as to where it comes from and who invented it. No one knows what the word Tarot means or to what language it belongs. Nor does anyone know if Tarot was like it is from the beginning or if it is the end result of a slow evolution that would have begun with the creation of an Arab card game called naibbe (cards) to which were added over the course of the years the Major Arcana and those whimsically called the Honors or Court Cards. The sole fact of creating new versions of the Tarot of Marseille, anonymous like all sacred monuments, by imagining it is enough to change the drawings or the names of the cards to achieve a great work, is pure vanity. The Tarot is crafted with such great precision, its internal relations and geometrical unity are so perfect, that it seems impossible to believe that this work was achieved by a solitary initiate. Merely the invention of the structure, the creation of the personages with their dress and their gestures, and the establishment of the abstract symbology of the Minor Arcana requires a great many years of intense labor. The short span of a single human lifetime would not be enough. What was the intention of the creator of this nomadic cathedral? Was one lone human being capable of giving shape to such a great encyclopedia of symbols? Who was capable of amassing such knowledge in a single lifetime? We can emit a theory about its origins that is both likely and useful : it was probably created sometime between year 1000 and 1400 by wise men and women from the three main monotheistic religions who wanted to unite their symbolic and numeric wisdom and give it away to all those who could see. As the public of these days was massively illiterate, their common work of sacred art was designed as a series of pictures united by a series of internal coherent bonds — numbers, symbols and names which, placed in the appropriate order, end up forming a mandala, a complete image of the universe. The 78 arcanas of the Tarot can either be viewed all together or separately, united two by two, then tree by three, and so on in segments of meaning that all relate to the « bigger picture ». In its totality, the Tarot as a mandala is a comprehensive portrait of human and cosmic experience, a mirror of our soul that is reflected in its mundane aspects as well as in its most sublime dimensions. The Tarot can help us better understand our Subconscious, with its dark corners and family conflicts, our creative processes, our material life, our attachements and emotions, our ideas, as well as our Supra-conscious aspirations to becoming one with the unthinkable force that sustains the Universe. Alejandro Jodorowsky’s first encounter with the Tarot happened in the early fifties, in Santiago de Chile, through a  sixty-year-old Frenchwoman, Marie Lefèvre, who shared her dinner and read the cards to a bunch of young wandering poets. That extraordinaty woman, always accompanied by her eighteen-year-old boyfriend, always had a full pot of soup simmering in her kitchen, a chaotic magma that contained the leftover food the neighboring restaurant gave her in return for her card readings for its customers. While her naked lover snored away, Marie, wrapped in a Chinese dressing gown, served full bowls of the delicious broth before she proceeded to the Tarot reading, using cards of her own making. In Jodorowsky’s memory, the Tarot forever remained linked to generosity and boundless love. André Breton then drew his attention to the fact that the only Tarot deck that was worth studying was the Tarot of Marseille, actually the closest to the original. For a long time, the only version of that original Tarot was the one that Paul Marteau had put together and published in 1930 — it was the one that Breton favored. When young Jodorowsky, expecting his approval, naively allowed himself  to offer him a Rider Waite Deck, the Pope of Surrealism examined the cards with a smile that soon transformed into a grimace of disgust. “This is a ridiculous deck of cards. Its symbols are lamentably obvious. There is nothing profound in it. The sole valid Tarot is that of Marseille. Its cards are intriguing and moving, but they never surrender their intrinsic secret. One of them inspired me to write Arcanum 17.” Trusting the poet’s word, Jodorowsky set up to studying all he could about the Tarot. He came to the conclusion that it is a sacred work, thus, by essence, perfect. The disciple should adopt it as it is, without attempting to add or subtract anything whatsoever. To integrate it into one’s life, beyond memorizing it, you have to perform actions that rational minds would no doubt consider childish. For example, you can slept every night with a different card under your pillow, or spent an entire day with one of them in your pocket, rub your body with the cards, speak in their names, imagining the rhythm and tone of each of their voices, visualize each figure naked, or complete the drawings that seem to vanish in the frame. This assiduous and loving study took Jodorowsky forty years before he met with two people who would become his main allies in the restoration of the Tarot and the writing of this book. First came the encounter with Philippe Camoin in 1994. Philippe was the last heir of the card makers of Marseille, and they both decided that they would restore the Tarot as close as possible to its original form. The difficulty of this work resided in the fact that the Tarot of Marseille is made up of symbols that are closely intertwined and connected to one another — if a single line is altered, the entire work is adulterated. A large number of printers of the Tarot of Marseille existed during the seventeenth century. Eighteenth-century Tarot decks were copies of the earlier ones. While the drawings were hand-painted originally, the number of colors the industrial machines used by eighteenth-century printers could produce was limited. Depending on the printer, the lines and colors were reproduced with more or less fidelity. Those who were not initiates simplified the symbols tremendously. Those copying them added errors to errors. On the other hand, Jodorowsky and Camoin observed that some Tarots have identical and superimposable drawings, and yet each contains symbols that do not appear on the others. They deduced that they had been copied from the same Tarot, an older version that was now missing. It was this original Tarot that they intended to restore. All the museums lent them the original cards, wooden moulds and presses. Little by little, they began to restore most of the original shapes and symbols. But an apparently insurmountable problem remained : no museum owned a Tarot of Marseille that was complete, ancient, and hand-painted. Jodorowsky then remembered that on the Plaza Rio de Janerio in Mexico City, the antiquarian Raul Kampfer, a specialist in Aztec and Mayan relics, had once tried to sell him an old hand-painted « French Tarot ». The price was unaffordable : ten thousand dollars in 1960. Almost miraculously, when they arrived in Mexico, they found that deck intact in the late Raul Kampfer’s shop, where his son, unaware of the treasure he kept in cardboard box, agreed to sell it a reasonable price. This Tarot served as the essential guide for restoring the former colors by computer. In the meantime, just a hundred yards away from Jodorowsky’s house (situated on the Liberation boulevard), in the rue de Marseille lived a young woman named Marianne Costa. Her relationship with the card had been pretty close since the day she found a bunch of them spilled on her doormat. She had kept a record of the cards; they seemed to form a series of numbers which, her intuition told her, must have some secret meaning. The first day someone invited her to Jodorowsky’s weekly free card reading in a parisian café was the same day that Jodorowsky began using the new deck. She became his student and then his collaborator, and ultimately found out that the series of numbers the cards had suggested to her ten years before was actually Jodorowsky’s telephone number. Even if it is difficult for the rational mind to accept that nothing is accidental in nature, that everything that happens in the universe is caused by a preestablished law, that certain events are written in the future and that the effect precedes the cause, the beginnig of this collaboration seemed like the work of a destiny established by an inconceivable being… Jodorowsky and Costa ended up studying and reading the Tarot together, and writing this book together — therefore fulfilling what was indicated by the Arcana. The whole Tarot is organized around the collaboration of female and male archetypes : The Emperess-Emperor, The High Priestess-Pope, The Moon-Sun. The initiate needs his female complement, and vice versa, for both to attain an understanding guided by Cosmic Consciousness. If the Spiritual Teacher lies in the cards, it is essentially of androgynous nature, both a She and a He : this is the ultimate message of the Tarot.

3 comments on “Tarot – englishAdd yours →

  1. Hola Marianne,
    He llegado a conocer de vos y tus conocimientos a traves de una querida amiga que tuvo la suerte de participar en uno de tus talleres en San Francisco.
    Siempre y desde muy pequeñita me ha fascinado y atraído mucho todo esto.
    En fin, sin más rodeos me gustaría saber si haces consultas a distancia, estoy en Los Angeles, California.
    Sé que pronto estarás en Argentina, más precisamente en Córdoba, mi querida Córdoba, mi ciudad natal!!!
    Bueno, te deseo una linda estadía por allá y muchos éxitos!
    Desde ya muy agradecida de poder ponerme en contacto contigo!
    Saludos,

    Vanina

    1. :) muchas gracias Vanina. Cordoba esta muy cerca de mi corazon porqué alli tambien nacio Luis Ansa, el queridisimo maestro que me guio a la Via del Sentir.

  2. wonderful to read. some errors in translation:

    « For example, you can slept every night »

    –> « For example, you may sleep every night »

    « Her relationship with the card had been pretty close since the day she found a bunch of them spilled on her doormat »

    –> « Her close relationship with the cards was formed the day she found some spilled over her doormat »

    « She had kept a record of the cards; they seemed to form a series of numbers which, her intuition told her, must have some secret meaning. »

    –> « She made a record of those cards; they seemed to.. »

    thank you for doing this work ∞

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *